• Why The Authorized KJB?

​

​

• "The foundation texts upon which any translation rests are all-important. If the foundation is false the translation will be false. If the foundation is corrupt the translation will be corrupt. If the foundation is erroneous the translation will be erroneous. The texts upon which the modern English perversions of the Holy Scripture are founded are neither reliable nor accurate." Dr. Ian R.K. Paisley, My Plea for the Old Sword

​

• “I can say with 100% confidence that the King James Version in the English language that I have today is the exact equivalent to God’s Word when it was written down in its original languages of Hebrew and Greek. To say anything less is to call God a liar!” Eric & Lonna Neumann, Bible Per-VERSIONS, p.4

​

• “Once Thomas Nelson & Sons abandoned their responsibility to pass on their Christian faith and trust in the King James Bible, the Lord allowed the company to go its own way, stage #4 of the Devil’s plan:

1. Confusion

2. Doubt

3. Disbelief

4. Rebellion

Right now, as far as major publishers are concerned, 55% of all Bibles are produced by the same company: New Corporation. And every single division favors the Catholic religion, Satan’s counterfeit church.” David W. Daniels, NEW KING JAMES THE BRIDGE BIBLE, p. 201

​

• “To a large extent, the KJV owes its authority to the rule that inserted words were printed in italics. The Bible reader was thus able to see how carefully the translators treated God’s Word. They were afraid to add even one word, but if they were not able to translate without adding a word for the sake of clarity, they indicated that it had been added.” Jakob van Bruggen, The Future of the Bible

​

• “In Bible college I was taught the lie that the scholars of Alexandria were the best in the world. So their copies of scripture were also the best in the world. I bet many of my readers were told that, too. And we were told that the best examples of Alexandrian scholarship were the giant ancient books, Codex Vaticanus and especially Codex Sinaiticus. Do you realize we were told this, but we were never able to see Sinaiticus for ourselves? Think about what that means. It means that not only did we have blind faith in Sinaiticus, a book we’d never seen…We also had blind faith in our professors. Faith in God is one thing, but everyone else? Remember the scripture: Romans 3:4 ‘…yea, let God be true, but every man a liar….’ Or the paraphrase: In God we trust: all others pay cash.” David W. Daniels, Is the World’s Oldest Bible a Fake?, p.131

​

• “Only those of us who hold to a ‘King James Only ‘ position believe we have a perfect, preserved, inspired Bible. We simply believe what the Lord Jesus Christ believed.” Bill Bradley, Purified Seven Times, p.124

​

• “God has kept His promise and left us a reliable Bible which is inspired (God-breathed) and preserved (1611 King James Bible), which is illuminated by the power of Him who preserved it. The Lord promised His Word would endure in spite of the devil’s attack on it with fire, sword and his most subtle attack, the new versions which are being accepted by both the ‘wolves in sheep’s clothing’ and the deluded.” Dr. Dennis Lloyd, My Indestructible King James 1611 Bible, p.10

​

• “Today, Satan is still getting man to question the second-hand words of God by deceiving good men into thinking the perfect words of God can only be found in the originals by way of Greek and Hebrew manuscripts. These theologians, these men with doctorate degrees who stand before us, are often just deceived men pushing deception on others! These men who try to get you to trust more in the so called original Greek are doing the same thing Satan did to Eve! Don’t fall for it!” Dan Goodwin, Hath God Said?, p.68

​

• “It’s amazing; people go to great lengths to study, years of arduous and sacrificial time, so that they can put letters after their name that supposedly give them the authority to tell others what Bible is the best, when all the time they haven’t got a Bible to present to us.” Dr. Dennis Lloyd, My Indestructible King James 1611 Bible, pp.21-22

 

• “It is a tragedy that today many pastors, preachers, theologians and academics have ‘lost’ God’s Word. They no longer have one book which IS the Word of God, because ‘professing themselves to be wise, they became fools (Rom 1:22).” Dr. Dennis Spackman

​​

• “…there are those who think that most modern versions of the Bible are acceptable, thinking that they add to the richness in diversity of knowledge of what God has imparted to mankind. If one listens to critics, he or she will be led to believe that there is no perfect version of the Bible today, but such an argument is flawed from the outset simply because it is contrary to various promises made by God Himself regarding His Word.” Andrew Steers, Ph.D., Is There Not a Cause, p. 7

​

• “When you study the Greek, you are not studying the Bible; you are studying one man’s opinion of the definition of Greek words. Most of the time those Greek theologians that you are studying don’t believe the King James Bible is right. They have come up with their own definitions of those Greek words. Many of the Greek definitions given in these lexicons (note lex-I-cons) line up with the corrupt NIV translation. It is unbelievable that we have been so brainwashed and so lied to and that we have been so gullible to believe that these men can help us understand our Bible better.” Dan Goodwin, Hath God Said?, pp.70-71

​

• “The King James Bible is built on the foundation of faith by men who had a high regard for the Bible, using massive manuscript evidence to support their work. They meticulously translated the Greek and Hebrew words, rendering them as closely as possible into English. The Modern versions are built on a foundation of doubt by men who have a low regard for the Bible. A few corrupt manuscripts were used to support their work. For the most part, they loosely translated the concepts of the Greek and Hebrew and some versions are even sloppier, not translating at all but paraphrasing. I have to wonder: If you are not using the King James Bible, why not?” David L. Brown, Ph.D., The Indestructible Book, p. 414-15

​

• “…the Westcott-Hort theory is based upon false principles, follows fallacious methods, and is not worthy of the credence given to it by so many.” Alfred Martin, A Critical Examination of the Westcott-Hort Textual Theory

​

• “The fact is that many a Christian has had doubts, fears, and skepticism instilled in his mind by these claims of discovering ‘more accurate manuscripts.’ The practical outcome has been that many Christians are uncertain of their ability to believe every word in any translation, especially the King James Version; hence, his prayer life, his witnessing, and his struggle with personal sins has been dealt a damaging blow.” Bruce Lackey, Can You Trust Your Bible?, pp.51-52

​

• “The most serious problem created by the multiplicity of versions and half-truths from textual critics is that many believe that we have no accurate, infallible Bible anywhere in the world today. To say that it exists in all the versions is to say, in effect, that you can not find it, since no one can agree on the best way to resolve all the differences in the versions.” Bruce Lackey, Can You Trust Your Bible?, p.51

​

• “…I refuse to believe men. I believe God. I believe God made and kept His promise to preserve His words. There is only one Bible, copied and translated accurately for us in the English language, that passes the test and that has passed down that same inspiration: the King James Bible. I can call it SCRIPTURE without any qualification. This is the scripture in English.” David W. Daniels, 51 Reasons Why The King James, p.22

​

• “English speaking people were presented in 1611 with a preserved copy of God’s words. Once we had that, we did not need another. satan’s subsequent con job, to ‘fix the King James’ through the ‘science of textual criticism,’ has let him gleefully lead the masses into a mess of confusion and doubt.” David W. Daniels, But I Trust The Scholars, p.55

​

• “Only those of us who hold to a ‘King James Only ‘ position believe we have a perfect, preserved, inspired Bible. We simply believe what the Lord Jesus Christ believed.” Bill Bradley, Purified Seven Times, p.124

​

• “The Battle over the word of God today is the same Battle that was fought by our Forefathers. Sadly, the difference today is that many have not the discernment nor the backbone to know and stand for the faith which was once delivered unto the saints. If Greek and Hebrew are needed to fully understand our Bible, then we have gone back to the bondage and slavery of the popes of Rome!” Dan Goodwin, Hath God Said?, p.10

​

• “God has honored the King James Version. It is the Bible of the 160,000,000 English-speaking people, whose tongue is spoken by more of the human race than any other…The King James Version has been translated into many other languages. One writer claims 886. It is the Book of the human race. It is the author of vastly more missionary enterprises than any other version. It is God’s missionary Book.” Benjamin C. Wilkinson, Our Authorized Bible Vindicated

​

• “…God communicates to us specifically by His word, and His word is pure. Our job is not to doubt or destroy it, but rather to study, understand, and obey it. We need not follow apocryphal visions or obscure scripts, nor do we need feelings or repetitive customs to define our final authority for matters of faith and practice. We have God’s word. This specific word, translated at the threshold of ubiquitous English influence and with supernatural accuracy, is published in the world’s language, revealing God to whosoever will know him.” Paul W. Scott, English for Bible Readers, p.3

​

• “Now, when someone defends his use of the modern Bibles by expressing his trust in the scholars, you can decide whether to challenge his misplaced faith. You will have to calculate whether you might be subjected to the same ridicule as the many saintly scholars who have defended the preservation of God’s words in history. Two types of scholars, two agendas. Bible-believing scholars believe the Bible over their own opinions. The other kind of scholars believe their own opinions over the Bible. There is no middle ground. There are two types of scholars in the world: which are YOU going to trust?” David W. Daniels, But I Trust The Scholars, pp.74-75

​

• ​“If God did not inspire the Bible, then ‘preservation’ is irrelevant since there is nothing to ‘preserve.’ If God did not preserve that which He inspired, then there is no perfect Bible on this earth anywhere right now. The claim of infallibility for the Bible was only relevant for the generation that held the original autographs in their hand. Every generation after that had either a mere copy or translation. Thus, no one today could honestly say that the Bible is infallible. If God inspired the Bible without error in the Originals and then allowed it to be lost over the centuries, then it was senseless to inspire it in the first place. Inspiration without preservation is a ‘Divine waste of time.’” Dr. Samuel Gipp, Is Our English Bible Inspired?, p.16

​

• “The unfaithful scholars have successfully twisted the conversation away from a solid trust in the one Bible [King James Bible] that has historically produced strong faith in its readers, to many Bibles that leave Christians in a quagmire of doubt and confusion today, even in our ‘Bible-believing’ churches. Now when we hear the statement: ‘But I trust the scholars,’ we must ask the question: Whichscholars are we talking about?” David W. Daniels, But I Trust The Scholars, p.54

 

• “If you were the Devil, how would you get people to disregard over 99.5% of the evidence (right now about 5,700 Greek Bible manuscripts) and fall for a made-up text, based mainly on just two big books? Add to that the fact that one of them, Vaticanus, only showed up in the Vatican’s library about 1475, and nobody got to see it much until 1867. And the other one, Sinaiticus, was the project of a revolutionary monk, with the help of his great-nephew in 1839-40? Easy. Just make the doubting scholars think they were the greatest thing since sliced bread.” David W. Daniels, But I Trust The Scholars, p.59

​

• “So the question is this: is the King James Bible ‘inspired’ or ‘preserved?’ The answer is simple, both! It is not inspired in the same fashion as the Originals were. In the case of the Originals, they started with a blank sheet of paper and when a man was done writing, the result was the inspired originals. (Ps. 12:6) We all know the King James translators did not sit in a room with a blank sheet of paper and write as did Isaiah. No, they had both Greek and Hebrew manuscripts, numerous early English translations as well as foreign language translations. For that reason we say the King James Bible is the preserved word of God. (Ps. 12:7) But, is the King James Bible inspired in that it is the preservation of the inspired words of God? Absolutely. As one great preacher asked, ‘If the King James Bible isn’t inspired, at what point did inspiration ‘fall out’?’” Dr. Samuel Gipp, Is Our English Bible Inspired?, p.69

​

• “The OAO [Original Autographs Only] doctrine, has been taught from April of 1881…to the present day. What started in Princeton University [by ‘A.A. Hodge and B.B. Warfield’] is now in the statements of faith in conservative Christian churches and taught in Bible colleges and seminaries. Maybe even yours. According to OAO, all subsequent documents contained intentional or accidental errors left by sloppy copyists or translators with their own ideas. That means it’s now up to the scholars to decide which readings they feel are most likely to be what God said. When they can’t agree, which is often, they simply add a footnote and push the decision off to the reader, as to which one heor she likes. This essentially leaves us with a multiple-choice Bible, up for grabs as to what God really said. It became popular and ‘scholarly’ to ignore Christ’s promise to preserve His words.” David W. Daniels, But I Trust The Scholars, pp.52-53

​

• "So if I have a preserved copy of the Bible, I also have an inspired copy of the Bible, because it is impossible to start with something inspired and to preserve it, without it continuing to be inspired." Dr. Dennis Corle, God's Inspired Book, p. 14

 

• “Tyndale gave us our Bible language. No sets of words in English have ever been so deeply considered by so many good minds in our nation for so long, and then carried so far in space and time through the KJV.” David Daniell, The Bible in English, p.263

 

• “It would be impossible, as has been demonstrated in the foregoing biographical sketches, to collect at this day a body of professors and divines, from England and America together, which should be equal in numbers and in learning to those assembled by King James…” Alexander McClure, The Translators Revived, 1858, p.189

 

• “If the Bible is not the very Word of God, then it cannot be a good Book, because it would be filled with lies. Four hundred thirteen times we find the expression, ‘Thus saith the Lord.’ Two hundred thirty-five times the Bible describes itself as ‘the Word of the Lord.’ Forty-eight times it describes itself as ‘the Word of God.’ Eight times, speaking of its contents, it says, ‘the Spirit saith.’ Inspiration is what sets the Bible apart from all other religious books, such as the Koran or the Book of Morman. A preserved Koran has no life in it, even if it is a perfect copy of the original, because there was no inspiration of God in it to start with. If you take the inspiration out of the Bible and have a perfect copy of the words, you have reduced it to just another religious book, rather than ‘the power of God unto salvation.’” Dr. Dennis Corle, God's Inspired Book, p.16

 

• “I have found that a number of the people who fight against the King James as God’s preserved words do so because they have some preferences they don’t want God to pronounce against, or simply because they don’t want to have a singular authority in their life. They want a PAC Bible: a Pick-And-Choose version, with options at every turn, so they can worm out of any sin or find agreement with any religion, and have no absolute standard to judge them.” David W. Daniels, 51 Reasons Why The King James, p.12

 

• “It is inspiration that gives the Bible life. (Hebrews 4:12) It is inspiration that gives it power. (2 Timothy 3:5) It is inspiration that makes it holy. (2 Timothy 3:15) It is inspiration which makes it able. (2 Timothy 3:15) It is inspiration that makes it Scripture. (2 Timothy 3:16) It is inspiration that guarantees its authenticity as the Word of God. To question inspiration is to question the Source and authenticity of the document, as well as to remove any force and power that it had in its origin. We have an inspired and preserved King James Bible. It is perfect, it is complete, and it is alive. It has as much life and as much force to transform the lives of people as it had in its original form.” Dr. Dennis Corle, God’s Inspired Book—The Bible, pp.20-21

​

• “We’ve allowed the entire discussion of the doctrine of scripture, the text of scripture, and the translation of scripture to be determined by two men who believed in the communion of spirits and one of whom at least, routinely communed with spirits.” Phil Stringer, Westcott & Hort and Their Occult Connections

 

• “…God promised to inspire, preserve and keep His words whether we discovered all the secrets of the process or not. We would still have the Bible even if we were obstructed from exploring its lineage. God promised us His words, not an exhaustive log of each progressive step of preservation. So then faith cometh by hearing, and hearing by the word of God(Rom. 10:17). We walk by faith, not by science; not by archeological discovery; not by manuscript evidence. We walk by faith, not by the linguistic excellenceof Dr So-and-so.” Kyle Stephens, The Certainty of the Words, p.57

 

• “…how you feel about the Bible is how you feel about Jesus and they do not have a Bible they can totally trust. So that tells you where they are with Jesus.” Pastor Paul Reno, The Case for Inerrancy and Preservation

​

• “The King James Bible is the Word of God. The greatest thing that any preacher could ever do for himself would be to quit worrying about it. Just use it. Quit trying to second-guess what it says. Quit throwing it aside every time a contradiction seems to appear. Moses approached the burning bush because it was a contradiction. It was clearly on fire but it was not consumed. He didn’t walk away in frustration. Instead, he drew closer and found the depths of God. To the Bible student who has accepted the King James Bible, contradictions are an invitation. They are not evidence of a weak Bible. They are evidence of the student’s ignorance. Like the burning bush, the inexplicable draws us to take a closer look. While others run to lexicons and commentaries, the Bible believer prays and searches deeper. God reveals himself in those searches.” John M. Asquith, Further Thoughts on the Word of God, p.124

 

• "...those who claim allegiance to the Bible cannot seem to do enough to weaken its power. Scholars dilute the Bible text. Publishers come out with new, better-than-ever bibles every few months. Preachers freely correct the words of the living God. And young men herd off to seminaries (or rather cemeteries) to be taught the inadequacies of the Word of God. No one claims to have a painting that contains the work of Rembrandt. They either have a painting by Rembrandt or they do not. Even a careful imitation is worthless next to the real thing. Likewise, we either have God’s Word or we do not. Since God’s Word by reason of God’s own character must be totally pure, then an impure word cannot be God’s Word. God’s Word is incorruptible (I Pet. 1:23). That which is God’s Word is completely pure (Prov. 30:5). Other forms of printed matter (printed sermons, tracts, corrupted "bibles," etc.) may contain portions of God’s Word, but they cannot be said to be God’s Word." David Reagan, A Tale of Three Cities

 

• “Consider this: if the preserved text of the Bible is flawed in matters of history, then there are books that are more accurate than the Bible text, and these books stand in judgment upon the Biblical text, instead of the text of the Bible judging these other books. Something is seriously wrong with a position that makes other books more accurate than the Scriptures. Jesus said, ‘Thy word is truth’ (John 17:17). What can be truer than truth?” Chester W. Kulus, Those So-Called Errors, p.147

 

• "No single TR [Textus Receptus] edition matches every reading of the KJB. The KJB has all the correct readings in one place. Missionaries have translated the KJB int many languages. There is no THE TR. There are some 70+ differing TR editions and none of them match every reading of the KJB. Which TR edition would you use? What would you do when the reading differs from the KJB (which is your authority the KJB or any single TR edition)? There is no need to know Greek or Hebrew to translate to another language. The KJB is God's pure words perfectly preserved in English." John Word

 

• “What we need, therefore, is not to replace the Authorized Version… We need rather to teach and to train people up to the standard and the language and the dignity and the glory of the old Authorized Version”. Martyn Lloyd-Jones, Knowing the Times, p. 112

 

• "A lot of folks say that a translation can’t be inspired. They say that only the original languages are inspired or that only the original manuscripts were inspired. (They are no longer with us). Scripture does not support this view. Many folks say that saying a translation is inspired is 'double inspiration’ That is a false statement as preservation KEEPS the inspiration and as such is not 'double inspiration'." John Word, Inspiration Is In The Words, pg. 1

 

• “…as all new bibles, including the NKJB say ‘the new translations are revisions of the King James Version of 1611’—THEY LIE!. The facts are: NO BIBLE on the market is a REVISION of the King James Bible of 1611. NO ENGLISH BIBLE has been TRANSLATED off the Textus Receptus group of manuscripts since 1611. ALL the new Bibles since 1881 till now, were translated off a COMPLETELY different set of manuscripts. They do not agree with the Textus Receptus group of manuscripts your King James Bible came from.” Jack Mundey, Corruptions in the New King James Bible, p.5

​

• “We must first understand our need for the Bible before we can ever begin to discover the version that is the truth. How sad would it be for us to go through life as Christians, as children of God, to just realize that the only source of truth for us was a lie. In other words if all we had were an ALMOST Holy Bible, then that means that God would have saved us and then let us live lives based on a book that lies.” Christopher E. Howe, The KJV is for Me, p. 13

 

• “The problem with placing your faith in modern-version-only theologians, especially those on the radio, instead of God is that you come away with the mistaken notion that you do not have an infallible Bible by a perfect God. It impugns the character of God to claim that He could not preserve His word. The modern-version-only cult walks by sight and not by faith. They have to hold the manuscripts in their hand whereas those of us who trust the Lord in this area do not need those critical text crutches.” Dr. Ken Matto, The Modern Version Incursion, p.6

 

• “At this point, I am not trying to convince anyone that the King James Bible contains the very words of God. I am trying to get you to accept that there is one. You cannot believe that all Bibles contain the words of God. Only one can be right because the words are not the same in all these so-called Bibles. Think about it! If God's words are preserved, they are written down somewhere. If two books do not contain the same words, one of them cannot contain the words of God.” Dr. Jack Hyles, The Need For An Every-Word Bible, p. 14

 

• “Another classic objection to the King James Bible is that it should never be used for translation purposes. According to this thinking, the King James Bible is good, but an honest translation could only come from the Greek text. That thinking might be good if its proponents could find a person who spoke ancient Greek… The first and obvious fallacy to this policy is that there is probably not a translator on the field today that is conversant in Greek. This objection to translating from the AV 1611 is all part of the great charade imposed upon the ignorant.” John M. Asquith, Further Thoughts on the Word of God, p.123

 

• “Preachers that believe in the resurrected Christ, who will soon return, are certainly needed today. But how will men believe these truths, with certainty, unless they believe in the preservation of the Scriptures which testify of these important doctrines?” Joey Faust, The Word: God Will Keep It, p.254

 

• “While apparent contradictions can strengthen faith, since they can define and limit doctrine, substantiate inspiration, and motivate study of the Bible; yet they can also serve as a test of faith. If the preserved text has an apparent contradiction, the responsibility of the student is to receive the preserved Words of God (John 17:8) by faith and to believe that they are without error (John 17:17).” Chester W. Kulus, Those So-Called Errors, p.117

​

• “What is a Westcott/Hort bible? Let me give you some names—see if you recognize these. The English Revised Version, The American Standard Version, The Revised Standard Version, The New American Standard Version, The Living Bible, The New Living Translation, The New English Bible, The Revised English Bible, The NIV, ISV, ESV, New World Translation, Jerusalem, New Jerusalem, New American, New Revised Standard, Holman Christian Standard, Today’s English Version, Today’s NIV, International Children’s Bible. Shall I go on? The legacy of the King James Bible is ‘Thus saith the Lord.’ The legacy of these doubting Thomas bibles is ‘Yea, Hath God said?’ I may not understand every word of my Bible but I believe every word of my Bible. Brothers and Sisters, it makes a huge difference which Bible you use. Choose wisely!” David W. Daniels

​

• If one doesn't realize that Satan questioned the spoken words of God before he denied them in Genesis 3, attacked the Living Word of God while Jesus was here on earth and was attacking the written word of God while it was still being given per 2nd Corinthians 2:17, one doesn't understand the enemy and his strategy. Why would Satan change his strategy as it works for him. Scripture is our only defense against false doctrines and how we are to try the spirits. Corrupting scripture makes the corruption a weakened sword that will break in battle. No one believes the modern versions are perfect. The KJB is the bible folks like to attack. It has been here for 412+ years with every modern publisher trying to replace it. Modern versions are everchanging just to keep sales up as that is why they are produced. The KJB marches on despite every attempt to replace and remove it. Think on these things. - John Word, King James Bible Debate

​

• “…two biblical principles must be understood. The first principle is that God has promised, without exception, to preserve not only the ‘word’ which He has given to man, but also the ‘words.’ This promise is confirmed every time God commands us to read, memorize, meditate upon, learn, or obey the words which He has given us. Nowhere in the Bible does God suggest the possibility of us not having His words. The promise of preservation is stated as follows in Psalm 12:6, 7: ‘The words of the LORD are pure words: as silver tried in a furnace of earth, purified seven times. Thou shalt keep them, O LORD, thou shalt preserve them from this generation for ever.’ This passage demands responsibility from present-day Christians. According to God, His words are preserved pure. If they are preserved, then we had better find them and believe them without correcting them.” David F. Reagan, Th.D., A Tale of Three Cities, pp.1-2

 

• “…God holds us responsible for adding to or taking away from His words. It doesn’t take a genius to know that we need to have God’s words. Otherwise, how would we know whether we are adding to or taking away from them? So, God promised to preserve His words, and to hold us accountable for changing them in any way. That means first, they exist. And second, that means we can find them.” David W. Daniels, 51 Reasons Why The King James, p.9

 

• "The King James Bible believer is the only one today who consistently, historically and logically stands for the doctrinal truths that God has kept His promises to preserve His inspired words and that there really exists such a thing as a complete, inerrant and 100% true Holy Bible." -Will Kinney

 

• “In scripture, the word ‘scripture’ is used 53 times. One time in Daniel 10:21 and 52 times in the New Testament, and every single time its not referring to the Autographs [Originals], its referring to copies. I don’t believe in OAO [Original Autographs Only]. I believe in God’s providential preservation of His Holy words…Starting in the 1800s a new group in Princeton did not believe in providential preservation and made that doctrine of OAO. So, people like to make you think that our idea of the Bible being preserved is something new…its not. When they say ‘Bible’ and ‘scriptures’, they’re referring to what? There is nothing to point to. Because it is not there. When I say, ‘I believe in the Holy Bible and the Holy Scriptures, I can point right to it…It’s in my hand. Like the people of old, I believe in God’s providential preservation and that I have the same authority as the Originals had, because they were copied correctly and translated right. So, the OAO people…got nothing to point to but invisible originals, and professors that they can trust. Which do you trust?” David W. Daniels

 

• “…there are people who HATE the King James Bible. When I came to Bible college, I was told: 90-something percent of all Bibles are the same. But don’t you DARE trust that King James Bible! That’s a BAD BOOK!...But if you go into Bible college or seminary, you have to know where your faith is before you go. They are good at persuading people out of trusting the King James. Know the facts.” David W. Daniel, YES You Can (And You Should) Read The King James Bible, pp.37,39

 

• “Most of the people I talk to that use other translations will admit their version is not perfect. In essence they believe in an ALMOST Holy Bible where I believe in a completely Holy Bible. I believe this based on scripture itself where God has promised that he would preserve his word to ALL generations. (Psalm 12: 6-7)” Christopher E. Howe, The KJV is for Me, p.7

​

• A heretic is one who affirms doctrines that are contrary to Scripture. Heresy occurs when someone changes the Scriptures to prove their doctrine. If there is no preserved Bible in the world today, then no one can be charged with heresy; however the doctrine of preservation serves to protect those of us that want to be right in our faith and practice from perverse teachers, and it maintains our right to reject heretics after 2 admonitions (Titus 3:10) - G Antonio Smart 

​​

• “Some have concluded that because the original words that God spoke were in Greek, Hebrew and Aramaic, that God only inspired and preserved the words in the original languages. This is an erroneous teaching for at least two reasons. First of all, because we learn at the Tower of Babel that God is the Author of all languages, and therefore experiences no language barrier. He is capable of articulating His Word in English without losing the perfection and power it had in the original languages. Second, God’s words are spirit, and His Spirit is not limited to a single language. We therefore conclude, on the premise of Psalm 12:6-7, that God has preserved both the perfection and the inspiration of His Word in the King James Bible.” Dr. Dennis Corle, God’s Inspired Book—The Bible, p.18

 

• “I believe the Bible is the Word of God. I do not try to explain that, nor do I try to explain it away, nor apologize for my faith. I believe we have the Word of God in the English language, and that Word is faithfully set forth in the King James Version. If we do not have a translation that we can trust, and that we can rely upon as being God’s Word, how could we know WITH ANY AUTHORITY that what we are preaching and teaching is true? Either we have a Bible, or we do not have a Bible. Either we have an accurately translated Bible, or we have a book full of holes, errors, mistakes, and question marks.” Dr. Bruce D. Cummons, The Foundation and Authority of the Word of God

 

• “So you have to come to a point, no matter how ‘intellectual’ you are, no matter how much training you have, of believing that either God told the truth, and His words (plural) are preserved… or that God lied.” David W. Daniels & Jack McElroy, Can You Trust Just One Bible, p.58

 

• “Our King James Bibles in the twenty-first century read substantially as the King James Bibles in the twentieth, nineteenth, eighteenth, and yes, even the seventeenth, centuries. It is the modern versions that have made significant changes to their texts. The King James Authorized Version continues to be the trusted authority for Bible-believing Christians the world over.” Laurence M. Vance, King James, His Bible, and Its Translators, p. 277

​

• “As long as I have been a preacher there has been discussion of an updates King James Bible. Several attempts, like the King James II, have been tried. They have all failed spectacularly. The King James critics are not really concerned about archaic words. That is a smoke screen. They want a series of Bibles translated according to the whims of modernist "scholars". They will never accept any bible as the sole authority. Their ego is their final authority. Those who love and respect the KJB are not looking for a new translation. There is no market for a King James II type translation. That has been proven over and over again.” Dr. Phil Stringer

​

• “Recently a new theological discussion has surfaced. It is based on the false idea that the King James Bible is preserved but it is not inspired. My question is very simple. If we begin with something inspired, and we preserve it, how do we lose inspiration in the process of preservation? This is theological double-talk. Furthermore, it is important to note that both inspiration and preservation are supernatural acts of God. Everyone involved in this debate believes that the Bible was inspired by God in the Originals, but some believe that inspiration was lost in translation…if you take the breath or the inspiration out of the Scriptures, it is a dead book. If our Bible is not inspired, then it is equivalent to an embalmed Bible. The form is still there, but the life is gone.” Dr. Dennis Corle, God’s Inspired Book—The Bible, pp.11,13

 

• “The Bible has ceased to be the ‘last word’ for most Christians. They want to know what another version says or, if they do not like what they read they assume that it is a bad translation. So, instead of the word of God correcting us, we correct the word of God. In the minds of today’s Christians, the Bible has ceased to be solid substance that can be checked as an absolute authority.” Dr. David Reagan

 

• “The Word of God today is the King James Bible. It is not the RV that came along in 1881. It is not the ASV, or the NKJV, or the Living Bible, or the Good News for modern man. It is not the NIV that has corrupted the Scriptures and left out entire passages from the word of God. It is the old KING JAMES 1611 BIBLE! It has stood as the authority for 400 years now.” Dan Goodwin, Hath God Said?, pp.35-36

​

• Respectfully, and I’m truly not saying this to be rude at all, but I don’t see any reason to spend any energy pondering the versions that came before the KJV (like the Geneva bible). Or any versions that came after the KJV. The GB was a stepping stone to the masterpiece. And anything that came after the KJV is a perversion. So now that we have the divine masterpiece we can really forget about everything else.

 

• "Is there some noble spiritual objective behind all these modern versions like there was with William Tyndale, Myles Coverdale, John Rogers, those behind the Geneva and King James Bible? I think not! The truth be known, I fear that the publishers are rooting for revenue in the religious pigpen." David L. Brown, Ph.D.

 

• Romans 8:1 (KJV) There is therefore now no condemnation to them which are in Christ Jesus, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit. The NIV and RSV do not contain "who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit." The words are omitted because they were not included in the Westcott and Hort Greek text that forms the foundation for the vast majority of the modern translations; however, the KJV reading is supported by a large number of ancient manuscripts and is doctrinally sound when compared to other Bible texts that clearly show that there is condemnation for believers who forsake the leadership of the Spirit to walk (be ruled in their conduct) after the flesh.

 

• “Let us stay the course! In the KJV is found the source of God’s blessings! You who love and use the KJV can be proud you use it! You can use it with the total confidence and full assurance that it is the preserved, inspired, infallible and inerrant Word of God, in the God-developed English language!” H. Wayne Williams, Does God Have A Controversy With The King James Bible? p.62

 

• “The NKJV translators all signed a document affirming they each believed in ‘the Verbal Plenary Inspiration of Scripture as originally written’ (NKJV Preface). This ‘as originally written’ disclaimer is a sophistry—a subtle deception, participated in knowingly or unknowingly—since there are no original ’Autographs’ extant today. To say you believe every word of a document no one can hold in his hand today is irrelevant as a stand for inerrancy of the Bible today.” Dr. Chris Sherburne, ENOUGH of this Bible “Confidence Game”, p.113

 

• “The doubting scholars and Bible Societies gave the impression they wanted to ‘fix’ the King James. But it turns out that what they really wanted was to replace the KJV with a text of their liking. The replacement text, of course, had nothing in common with the thousands of manuscripts that we know support the KJV. Instead, they wanted a ‘doubting text,’ one that reflected their own doubts about what God said, if He said anything at all. The result is a Bible what leaves the reader so confused that he is not sure what God meant to say.” David W. Daniels, But I Trust The Scholars, p.59

 

• “All the Devil wants is to get you away from the King James, by any means. Satan will promise anything if it will get you away. But if you buy into his smooth arguments, then you have lost the pure and preserved words of God. And all the Devil (or anybody else) can offer in its place are man’s fallible opinions.” David W. Daniels, NEW KING JAMES THE BRIDGE BIBLE, pp.24-25

 

• “It is important that we learn not to treat the Bible like any other book…People talk about the Bible as if it were any other book. They debate the preservation of the Bible as if they were debating the preservation of any other book. They debate the translation of the Bible as if they were debating the translation of any other book. But the Scripture is not just any book. The Scripture has the power of God and promises of God upon it. It is the very Word of God. The Bible is the only authority for faith, doctrine, and practice. Please understand that one of the Baptist distinctives is that the Bible is more than the final authority; it is the sole authority. It was given supernaturally. It is preserved supernaturally.” Dr. Phil Stringer, The Unbroken Bible, p.81

 

• “Textual Criticism of the higher critical nature is a humanly contrived method to undermine the credibility of the Bible and is fueled by Satan.” David L. Brown, Ph.D.

 

• “Only the King James Bible is the true Word of God. I believe that every other English translation of the Bible is a perversion, a corrupt tool of the devil. Unfortunately, good people are unaware of these unholy bibles and read them in ignorance. I own many of these perverted translations so that I may be able to expose their errors to someone who is seeking the truth. But I have never read them, would never study out of them, would never quote them, would never memorize them, and would never recommend them.” Tim Fellure, Neither Jot Nor Tittle, p.180

​

• “Believing the KJB is word perfect in English is NOT double inspiration. The inspiration is in the words not the men nor the languages. Preservation KEEPS the inspiration (it is not lost through translation). Here are some translations in the Greek and Hebrew texts: 1. Joseph spoke to his brothers through an interpreter. He spoke Egyptian but it was recorded in Hebrew. Genesis 42:23. 2. Jesus spoke to Saul on the road to Damascus in the Hebrew tongue. It was recorded in Koine Greek. Acts 26:14 Here is biblical evidence that translations can be perfect. I believe by faith that God preserved His words perfectly and purely in English in the KJB. That means I believe that if God had given the originals in English they would read Exactly as the KJB.” John Word

 

• “The truth is you will not know the full implications of the KJV as God’s actual word and finished Bible until you have come to it with your heart full of willingness and conviction to receive it as such. Just like you will not truly know who Jesus is until you are actually saved by Him.” G. John Rov, Concealed From Christians, p. 9

 

• “Have you looked at your churches Statement of Faith lately? Is it possible it confesses a bible that does not and never did exist…Why do most Statements of Faith say, ‘We believe the Bible to be the word of God, but it is only inerrant in the original Autographs?’ Who cares about the original Autographs? All we have are copies of copies of copies. Nobody has the original Autographs…But don’t despair. Because God promised to preserve His words…Since God gives us this promise, and He preserves His word in copies, then you must believe a copy. Only one Bible has withstood the test for over 400 years, the King James Bible—for us in English…Now If your Statement of Faith for your church says they only believe in the inspiration of God, infallible or whatever, in the Autographs, they’ll have to admit they have never seen a Bible like that in their lives and they never shall…They can never hold a Bible in their hands and say, ‘This is the preserved words of God in my language.’.. So, if you only trust in the original Autographs that don’t exist then you doubt everything and have faith in nothing. How can you trust what you are reading as the Bible? See, I believe God’s Holy preserved words in English, the King James Bible. I believe I have a preserved copy and an accurate translation. I believe I have 2 Timothy 3:15 fulfilled in my hands. The Holy inspired scripture, the King James Bible. Go check your groups Statement of Faith…and ask them to rewrite it. If they’re serious about God’s truth they will rewrite it or if they are honest, they will admit that they believe in a bible that does not exist. I like my choice!” David W. Daniels, Does Your Church Trust a Bible that Doesn’t Exist?

​

• “…the entire anti-inspiration, anti-preservation controversy is all about a worldwide effort to destroy the holiness and perfection of God’s Word. Satan is behind this effort, around this effort and at the head of it. He hates God’s Word. He employs any and all who, through ignorance or intention, will swallow his carnal intellectualism and worldly wisdom. In the English-speaking realm, his attack is against the King James Bible. Interestingly, Satan’s wrath has not been kindled against any of the copyrighted versions translated from the corrupted texts with their additions and deletions, their pollutions and dilutions, and their allowances and perversions. No other version is under attack at all. The newer versions simply die out of circulation for lack of interest and readership.” Jeff Farnham, God’s Forever Word, p.161

 

• "If the Bible was not inspired, then it CANNOT be used as a reliable standard! If the Bible was inspired and the readings lost, then it CANNOT be used as a reliable standard! And if the Bible texts are not preserved, then it CANNOT be used as a reliable standard! That IS the belief and teaching of those who laid the faulty foundation of the modern Bible versions; the Bible CANNOT be used as a reliable standard! They adopted the higher critical view of the Bible. Underlying every modern version of the Bible is the diabolical teaching that the Bible is NOT a reliable standard for belief and practice!" Pastor David L. Brown, Ph.D., The Motley Crew Behind

• The Modern Bible Versions

 

• “It only takes ONE change to make God’s Word an UNHOLY Bible. Therefore, you should not argue, ‘Well, I can use the NKJV because it is easier to understand than the KJV and is not as bad as the other versions.’ That is like saying, ‘Well, I don’t mind going to the lake of fire, as long as I get one of the less hot sections!’ If there is just one error in the translation, it is not God’s Word, it is not true, and it cannot be relied upon, no matter how attractive the package that the devil has put it in for you.” Eric and Lonna Neumann, Bible Per-VERSIONS, p.11

​

• “What more could God possibly give you than what you have? [the King James Bible]. The Greek is dark. No one knows it. Preachers can’t preach in it. They can’t think in it. They can barely read it without a dictionary right at hand. Year after year young preacher boys will be sent off to Bible colleges where professors who can’t speak Greek will tell their charges that they are being empowered by Greek. This is called ‘light.’ Meanwhile the great work of God that was begun 400 years ago in the English-speaking people is being slowly snuffed out.” John M. Asquith, Further Thoughts on the Word of God, pp.66-67

​

• “The five reasons a revised Bible should not be used in our daily Bible study or churches.

1. They cause widespread confusion.

2. They discourage memorization, for they are all different.

3. They provide an opportunity for perverting the truth. They are not all right with all the different slants on the Scriptures.

4. They make it challenging to teach the Bible. When everyone in your church is reading from a different bible, it is challenging to be unified in studying God’s Word.

5. The most significant reason is that the King James Bible has never been proven incorrect.” Stephen R. Gentry, God’s Word to Man, pp. 170-171

​

• "It was the conspiracy of Westcott and Hort to force secretly upon the Revised Version translators their new Greek Text which put the Revised Version off the rails and commenced the rash of English perversions of the Holy Scripture. So dishonest was their behaviour that Charles Wordsworth, Bishop of St. Andrews, refused to sign his name to a testimonial of thanks to the Chairman because he was so discouraged by "the number of minute and unnecessary changes made in direct violation of the instruction under which the work was undertaken." Looking back on the translation, the Bishop called it "a deplorable failure". It was however, more. It was a damnable conspiracy to set up false Bibles seeking to usurp the place of the one and only true Bible." Dr. Ian R.K. Paisley, My Plea for the Old Sword

​

• “The Revised Version New Testament was first published in 1881, followed by the Old Testament in 1885. It was then republished in 1952 as the Revised Standard Version, then republished again in 1989 as the New Revised Standard Version, and finally republished most recently in 2001 as the English Standard Version (ESV). Changes were made to each of the three revisions in order to meet the copyright law regulations. The original version was flatly rejected by the church at large and it never gained acceptance due to its drastic butchering of the Word of God. The two Revised editions which followed the original were also rejected and never gained acceptance. However, the ESV has finally gained some acceptance in these recent years; but it is just as corrupt as the earlier editions. The old adage is true … if you present a lie over and over again; there are those who will eventually believe it, accommodate it, and promote it. May God help us!” James Grumblatt, The Dangers of the ESV “Bible”

​

• “There are no ‘NIV-only,’ ‘NAS-only,’ ‘ESV-only,’ or even ‘New King James-only’ movements. Only the King James Bible in English has inspired people to trust it, to the rejection of all other English Bibles. They trust it exclusively, because of its faithfully preserved text, as well as its faithfully written translation. It is, they believe, exactly what God would have said, had He written down His words in Classical English.” David W. Daniels & Jack McElroy, Can You Trust Just One Bible, p.12

​

• “Why not IGNORE the Septuagint? It’s a mess. Why don’t we rely on the great translation, the KJB, translated by linguists who knew all the early Greek Christianmasters’ works? Why don’t we quit trying to be pseudo-scholars, forever questioning the well-documented and superior translation by superior scholars? We should stop using corrupted lexicons and manuscripts (e.g. Septuagint revisions and recensions by the dozens) written by unbelieving scholars." H.D. Williams, M.D., Ph.D., The Septuagint LXX, p.35

​

• “The major problem in the Bible controversy is that many people in the pew and many in the pulpit do not understand that there are two Greek texts. There is the Traditional Greek Text, which can be traced right back to the beginning, and there is the modern Critical Text which was developed about 130 years ago. From the Traditional Text there is only one major English Bible translation, The King James Bible. From the Critical Text comes virtually every other modern translation. …It is not an issue of ‘Readability’ or a particular version you prefer, but one text is based on the true word of God and one is not.” Dr. David Sorenson

​

• “The major problem in the Bible controversy is that many people in the pew and many in the pulpit do not understand that there are two Greek texts. There is the Traditional Greek Text, which can be traced right back to the beginning, and there is the modern Critical Text which was developed about 130 years ago. From the Traditional Text there is only one major English Bible translation, The King James Bible. From the Critical Text comes virtually every other modern translation. …It is not an issue of ‘Readability’ or a particular version you prefer, but one text is based on the true word of God and one is not.” Dr. David Sorenson

​

• “If the Bible was not inspired of God, then there is no need of a divine act of preservation. After all, why should God expend any energy to preserve a book that He refused to expend any energy to create? If He did not inspire the Bible, then to preserve it would have been a greater effort on His part than He used in its generation. Preservation without inspiration is impossible. If nothing was inspired then there is nothing that can be preserved. God’s promise of Psalm 12:7 is useless.” Dr. Samuel Gipp, Is Our English Bible Inspired?, p.22

​

• “By perverting the many important verses of scripture which deal with the fundamental doctrines of Christ, the new "bibles" have a CONTINUOUS ATTACK launched against our beloved Savior, and this is NOT an overstatement! His Virgin Birth is under attack in Isaiah 7:14, Luke 1:34, and Luke 2:33. His Blood Atonement is under attack in Colossians 1:14, Acts 20:28, Ephesians 1:7, and Revelation 1:5. The Bodily Resurrection is under attack in Acts 1:3, Luke chapter 24, and the last twelve verses of Mark. His Deity is under attack in Acts 10:28, John 9:35, and I Timothy 3:16. The new versions attack the Second Coming in Revelation 11:15, and Titus 2:13, and the list goes on, because the new versions have an extreme bitter HATRED toward the Authorized Version and the way it gives the Lord Jesus Christ the preeminent place.” James L. Melton, How I Know the King James Bible Is the Word of God

​

• “Inerrancy without preservation is senseless. Was God careless? Or didn’t He realise that these errors were creeping in? Or was He impotent that He could not keep His Word even if He wanted to? Look out yonder into space. Listen to some of the Christian astronomers and scientists who study the stars and all the planets and constellations there in outer space, and they will tell that God has so created them in such a meticulous fashion that they obey all the laws that He has laid down for the whole vast creation. If God is that careful to keep His universe, do you think He is going to be careless about His sacred, holy Word upon which hangs the destiny of the souls of men, whether for heaven or hell? You know good and well He could not possibly be careless about such a wonderful Book. But if you want to go ahead and believe in a God who has just let His Book go and become filled with errors through the mistakes of men, you go ahead, but please count me out as of now.” David Otis Fuller, Which Bible, pg. 4

​